Manure Transport Rates and Land Application Costs Tank Spreader (E2767)
On many farms, daily hauling of manure is being replaced by long-term storage and handling of liquid slurries.
On many farms, daily hauling of manure is being replaced by long-term storage and handling of liquid slurries. Manure from longterm storage is usually more uniform in nutrient content than manure spread daily, and this manure is often spread and incorporated within a few days’ time. This allows for timely use of manure as fertilizer and reduces nutrient loss to the environment. Long-term storage and slurry spreading requires a higher initial investment in structures and equipment than daily hauling, but such systems are often preferred because they are easily mechanized and offer a range of equipment options.
As farms increase in acreage and more animals are housed in one location, it’s necessary to transport manure farther for efficient nutrient use. The challenge for the livestock producer is to store, handle and use the manure in a cost-effective and safe manner. Managing manure in such a way requires knowledge of the costs of storage, handling and transport as well as the nutrient value of the manure applied. Tank spreader systems allow for a flexible spreading schedule, timely use of manure as fertilizer, and efficient use of equipment and labor.
The objective of this bulletin is to provide information for livestock producers and farm managers to use in determining a hauling rate (gallons per hour [gal/hr]), machinery costs (dollars per hour [$/hr]) and labor requirements for manure transport and land application using tank spreaders.
Tractor-drawn tank spreaders currently available range in size from about 800 to 12,000 gallons. Livestock producers use truck-mounted spreader tanks and nurse trucks to transport manure to remote locations in a timely and cost-efficient manner (Borton etal., 1995; Harrigan, 1997). Top-loading tank spreaders can be filled using an auxiliary pump. Vacuum tanks are filled by creating a vacuum in the tank to pull manure into it. In some cases, these vacuum tanks also provide agitation by drawing slurry into the tank and then discharging it back to storage. Vacuum tanks often have a purchase price 30 to 50 percent higher than top-loading tanks of similar volume. Most tank spreaders used on Michigan farms are toploading. The hauling rates and costs used in this bulletin are representative of top-loading tanks.
The manure-hauling cycle time is a measure of the total time needed to complete all steps of the hauling process: load, transport, unload and return. Cycle time varies from farm to farm and field to field. Normal time requirements for various aspects of the manurehauling cycle measured on several Michigan farms are listed in Table 1.
Travel distance can greatly influence labor and cost and have a major impact on the manure hauling rate. Average travel speed for tractors and trucks varies with road conditions and number of stops. Higher speeds are likely on paved than unpaved roads. Average speed with an empty spreader is about 20 percent greater than with a loaded spreader. Representative truck and tractor speeds are listed in Table 2. Average speed would be slower in areas with hilly and winding roads.
Manure injection and incorporation
Manure should be injected or incorporated by tillage soon after spreading. Manure runoff from land areas where manure has been spread is a potential source of water pollution. Animal wastes create high biological oxygen demand and free ammonia that are toxic to fish. Excess nutrients promote eutrophication in lakes and ponds, and pathogens contaminate fish and drinking water. Direct injection or rapid incorporation following surface spreading minimizes manure runoff.
Direct soil injection of liquid manure conserves nitrogen and greatly reduces the odor associated with land application. A winged injector can inject almost twice the volume at a given depth as a narrow injector. Winged injectors also distribute the manure over a wider area and decrease the potential for root inhibition and nitrogen loss.
Tillage tools are available for manure incorporation. A recent study in Ontario, Canada (Wright, 1994), evaluated a rolling tine aerator mounted behind a tank spreader to improve infiltration and nutrient recovery of liquid hog manure. The aerator loosened the soil in the surface 6 to 8 inches yet left a level, residuecovered surface. Where the aerator had tilled the soil, manure ponded only in holes created by the aerator teeth and soaked away within 20 minutes. No overland flow of manure occurred. Where the aerator was not used and manure was spread on the surface, manure tended to run and pond in wheel tracks. Infiltration took VA hours or more. The aerator also resulted in about 12 percent more available nitrogen, presumably because of lower volatilization losses from more rapid infiltration. This type of tillage tool may be particularly useful for livestock producers interested in no-till crop production.
Agitation and pumping
Manure slurries are agitated before removal from storage to create a homogeneous material for land application. Liquid manure pumps and pump/agitators can be mounted directly to a tractor three-point hitch, mounted on wheels or attached to the walls of aboveground storage structures. On-farm observations of several dairy and swine operations indicate typical spreader loading rates with PTOpowered pumps and pump agitators of 1,300 gpm.
Tractors ranging from 70 to 100 PTO hp are often suitable for small pit and lagoon pumps and agitators; larger pumps, pump agitators and propeller agitators require 100 to 150 PTO hp.
Handling sand-laden dairy manure
Tank spreaders are generally used for hauling flowable slurries with up to 10 percent dry matter. Straw, sawdust and similar organic bedding can be easily handled with proper equipment selection. But many dairy producers use sand bedding to reduce the occurrence of mastitis and maintain foot and leg health. Sand-laden manure presents many challenges in handling and transport. A gallon of dairy manure containing organic solids may weigh about 8 pounds; sand-laden manure may weigh 10 pounds or more. This added weight places added stress on the spreader chassis, tires and spindles. Accelerated machinery wear from pumping sand-laden manure can be costly and time consuming. Also, the sand may settle out in transport and plug the spreader. Refer to Extension bulletin E-2561, Storing and Handling Sand-Laden Dairy Manure, for suggestions about how best to manage sand-laden manure.
Matching tractor and spreader
Matching tractor and spreader is important in maintaining a safe and efficient system. The tractor must have sufficient power to overcome the rolling resistance of the spreader and sufficient weight to safely control the heavy implement in transport. Manufacturer and local experience can provide guidance in the matching of tractor and spreader. Ranges of likely options are listed in Table 3. Select a tank size near the low end of the range if the spreader will be hauled over soft or hilly ground or if the spreader is not equipped with an independent braking system.
Tractor-drawn tank spreaders
Farm managers, consultants and others working with manure transport use hauling rate information to select machinery to complete field operations within the time available. Many producers expect to spread about three loads per hour when hauling within % mile of storage. However, when hauling farther or using truck-drawn spreaders and nurse trucks, the hauling rate (gal/hr) achieved depends on the equipment set chosen, hauling distance and other farm-specific factors.
The hauling rate (gal/hr) of tractor-drawn spreaders declines rapidly with transport distance (Fig. 1). Selecting a larger tank can increase the hauling rate, but because loading and unloading time also take longer as volume increases, the hauling rate does not increase in direct proportion to tank volume. For instance, doubling tank volume from 3,000 to 6,000 gallons will increase the hauling rate about 60 percent with a 1-mile haul and about 90 percent with a 10-mile haul.
When manure is injected, the hauling rate is usually lower than when it is spread on the surface. The flow rate through each injector is typically about 130 gpm per injector shank, with four to seven shanks generally used. Additional maintenance is often needed for the injector unit, particularly if bedding and other debris that can clog the injector units are mixed with the manure slurry. This combination of a lower unloading rate and additional maintenance often provides for a hauling rate 20 to 30 percent lower than that of surface spreading.
Truck-mounted tank spreaders
There is little difference in hauling rate between truckmounted and tractor-drawn spreaders when the spreading site is near storage, but the faster travel speed of truck-mounted spreaders provides an advantage with longer hauls (Fig. 2).
A truck-mounted spreader has a hauling rate about 15 percent greater than a tractor-drawn spreader when hauling 1 mile and 60 percent more over10 miles. When hauling 3 miles, a 3,000-gallon truckmounted spreader is similar in hauling rate to a 4,500- gallon tractor-drawn spreader. Doubling the tank volume from 3,000 to 6,000 gallons will increase the hauling rate about 60 percent with a 1-mile haul and 85 percent with a 10-mile haul. When using a highspeed agricultural tractor, the hauling rate of a tractordrawn spreader is similar to that of a truck-mounted spreader.
A nurse truck is often used to shuttle manure slurry to a tractor-drawn spreader when hauling far from storage. This machinery set allows rapid road transport and reduces wear on the tractor, but additional time is needed to transfer manure from the nurse tank to the spreader tank. Machinery options for this manure transfer include selection of a vacuum tank spreader to draw slurry from the tank, use of a truck-mounted tank with a tractor-powered auxiliary pump, and use of a nurse truck equipped with a hydraulic pump and swing boom.
When the hauling distance is 2 to 3 miles, one operator can use a nurse truck to shuttle slurry to a tractor-drawn spreader, transfer the slurry and spread it at about the same rate as using the tractor-drawn spreader alone (Fig. 3). The advantage with this system increases with transport distance. The hauling rate when using the nurse truck for a 5-mile haul will be about 20 to 25 percent greater than that of the tractor-drawn spreader alone and 40 percent greater with a 10-mile haul. Doubling the tank volume from 3,000 to 6,000 gallons will increase the hauling rate about 55 percent with a 1-mile haul and 80 percent with a 10-mile haul.
When two operators are available, a nurse truck can be used in parallel with a tractor-drawn spreader. One person transports manure from storage to field while the other loads the spreader and applies the manure. The spreader works at full capacity over the full range of transport distances because it can spread the slurry before the nurse truck can travel to storage, refill and return to the field. This system provides a hauling rate nearly equal to that of a truck-mounted spreader (Fig. 4). Doubling the tank volume from 3,000 to 6,000 gallons will increase the hauling rate about 60 percent with a 1-mile haul and 85 percent with a 10-mile haul.
Two nurse trucks are often used in parallel with a tractor-drawn spreader. This system uses one person to operate each nurse truck and a third to load the spreader and apply the manure. When the spreading site is within a few miles of storage, these nurse trucks are often able to fill the spreader tank, return to storage, refill and return to the field before the spreader tank has had time to unload. Because the spreader does not have to wait for a nurse truck, it is able to operate at full capacity. Two nurse trucks should be able to keep a tractor-drawn spreader working near full capacity with 2-, 2% - and 3-mile hauls when using 3,000-, 4,500- and 6,000-gallon nurse trucks, respectively (Fig. 5). The hauling rate drops off with longer hauls because the spreader tank must wait for a nurse truck to arrive.
The greatest advantage in using larger equipment is associated with long hauls. Doubling the nurse truck and spreader volume from 3,000 to 6,000 gallons increases the hauling rate about 35 percent with a 1-mile haul, 65 percent with a 3-mile haul and 85 percent with a 10-mile haul.
The hauling rate can also be increased by selecting a nurse truck with twice the volume of the spreader (Fig. 6). When 6,000-gallon nurse trucks are used, the tractor-drawn spreader is allowed to work at full capacity up to 4 miles from storage rather than 2 miles as with the 3,000-gallon nurse trucks. The hauling rate is 45 percent greater at 5 miles and 63 percent greater at 10 miles.
The impact of injection on the hauling rate when using nurse trucks varies with the hauling distance and size of equipment used. When slurry is transported within a few miles of storage, the system hauling rate is often limited by the capacity of the spreader (Fig. 7). Within this distance, the delays caused by injection may decrease the hauling rate 20 to 30 percent. As the transport distance increases and the spreader is able to unload before a nurse truck arrives, injection has less impact on the system hauling rate — a reduction of perhaps 10 percent due to delays for injector repair and maintenance. Doubling the tank volume from 3,000 to 6,000 gallons will increase the hauling rate about 30 percent with a 1-mile haul and 85 percent with a 10-mile haul.
Machinery and transport costs
Many things need to be considered when selecting a manure-handling and land application system. The best system for any farm will depend on farm size, number and type of animals, labor, crops grown and land available for spreading, hauling distance, terrain, soil type, existing structures and equipment, and many other factors. Ownership and operating costs are important, but the least-cost system may not be best for all farms.
Hourly charges for a range of manure-handling equipment are listed in Table 4. These costs include machinery ownership, repair and maintenance, and are based on accumulated use, fuel and labor associated with agitation, pumping, transport and spreading. Annual costs are presented on a cash-flow, before-tax basis using a real interest rate (approximately nominal rate minus inflation) of 6 percent. Machinery was purchased, depreciated over seven to 10 years and replaced. Charges for machinery ownership, fuel use, and repair and maintenance were based on hours of machine use. Machine use included time normally spent hauling and in short delays waiting for machines to complete their assigned task.
An additional labor requirement estimated as 15 percent of machine use was allowed for time when labor and machines were committed to manure hauling operations but work was delayed for machine adjustment or unexpected repair and maintenance.
Examples 1 and 2 illustrate how these hourly charges can be used with the hauling rates provided in Figs. 1-7 to estimate a system hauling cost or establish a rate for custom work. Not included in these estimates of a system hauling cost are charges for bedding, manure storage, alley scraping or barn cleaning. Nor is the nutrient value of the manure applied included. Net system costs can be substantially reduced if manure nutrients are retained and accounted for in the cropping program (Harrigan etal., 1996).
Example 3 illustrates how custom hauling provides an opportunity to increase use of specialized equipment and reduce machinery costs per unit of production. Machinery ownership costs such as depreciation, interest, shelter and insurance are fixed costs that do not vary with machine use. Increasing use distributes these costs over more units of production. In providing custom service, the machine owner benefits by creating revenue that helps cover ownership costs. The purchaser of the service benefits by having access to high-capacity, specialized equipment at a lower cost than those of owning similar equipment.